Library

Why can't I finish what I start?

Not finishing isn't a character flaw, and it isn't one of the five traits. The research points somewhere more useful: the dial you're working with, and how the unfinished part feels.

Updated · 6 min read

The pile of almost-done

The course you paid for and opened twice. The half-painted room. The draft that has been nearly done since spring. Starting was easy, even exciting. Somewhere past the middle the thing went quiet, and now it sits there, a small weight you notice every time you walk past it.

Most advice here says the same few things: set goals, build discipline, stop being a perfectionist. Some of it helps. Almost none of it asks why you, specifically, stall where you do. The Big Five, the personality model academic psychology actually uses (how the science works), is a good way into that question. Traits predict; they don't determine. None of what follows is a verdict on your character.

Start with the task, not your character

A meta-analysis of 691 correlations looked for what goes with putting things off. The strongest, most consistent links were how unpleasant the task feels, how far away its payoff is, how capable you feel of doing it, and impulsiveness, along with Conscientiousness and its facets (Steel 2007).

Notice how much of that list is about the task. The start of a project is new and the end is close, and the middle is where it tends to turn into a chore: the most effort and the least to show for it. That is a reading, not a finding, but it fits where most unfinished things stop.

Two researchers who study this argue that putting things off has a lot to do with mood repair: when a task feels bad, stepping away feels better now, and the cost lands on your future self (Sirois & Pychyl 2013). That isn't a moral failing. It is a very human trade, made in the moment, again and again.

The main dial: Conscientiousness

Conscientiousness is the dial for order, follow-through and keeping going when it's dull. It is strongly and consistently tied to procrastination, with self-control, distractibility, organization and achievement motivation all in the mix (Steel 2007). If yours sits low, the middle of a project has less holding it up from the inside.

That is a description, not a judgment. The low end of the dial has its own strengths, flexibility and ease with loose ends among them, and that is a reading of what the dial measures. The move that fits is to borrow the structure you don't carry: a fixed time, a smaller next step, someone who expects to see it.

You may have been told you lack grit. A meta-analysis of 88 samples found grit very strongly correlated with Conscientiousness and only moderately with performance, and its perseverance half predicted more than its consistency-of-interest half (Credé, Tynan & Harms 2017). So grit overlaps heavily with this dial, and sticking with one interest for years was the weaker part of it.

The pull of the new: Openness

Openness is how far your mind reaches for the unfamiliar. If yours sits high, the start of a project may be the best part: the idea, the reading, the first sketch. The middle is repetition, and a new idea is always more interesting than the fourth draft of an old one. That is a reading of what the dial measures, not a study finding, and you may recognize it.

One thing worth knowing: in the same meta-analysis, Openness, the curiosity dial, showed almost no link to procrastination (r ≈ .03) (Steel 2007). So curiosity isn't the problem. Our reading is that it becomes one when it meets a week with no structure: high Openness with low Conscientiousness has ten ideas and finishes none.

The move that fits isn't to stop starting things. It is to decide, before you start, which one thing gets finished this month, and to give the other ideas a parking place, a list you trust, instead of a slot in your week.

When the end is the hard part

For some people the stall comes right before the finish. Finishing means being judged, and a thing that's almost done can't fail yet. That is a reading, not a finding. Neuroticism, the worry dial, showed only a weak link to procrastination overall (Steel 2007), so this isn't the usual pattern. When it is yours, you'll know it: the work is fine, and handing it over is the hard part. The looping side of this dial has a piece of its own: why do I overthink everything.

What helps you finish

One small tool has a lot of evidence behind it: an if-then plan. If it's 8 on Saturday morning, then I open the draft and write one paragraph. Across 94 tests, plans that spell out when, where and how had a medium-to-large effect on reaching goals (d ≈ .65), both on getting started and on keeping going when something pulls you away (Gollwitzer & Sheeran 2006).

Given how much of the research points at the task, shrink the next step until it stops feeling bad: open the file, write one line, stop. And go easy on yourself about last time. Among 119 first-year students, those who forgave themselves more for putting off studying for one exam put off the next one less, especially among those who'd put off the first exam most, and feeling less bad was part of that link (Wohl, Pychyl & Bennett 2010). It is one study, and a correlation, but it points the same way as the mood research.

Can the dial itself move? A little. On average, people grow more conscientious across young adulthood, roughly 20 to 40, without setting out to (Roberts, Walton & Viechtbauer 2006). Intervention studies average about a third of a standard deviation over roughly six months, most of it in emotional stability (Roberts et al. 2017).

The part that counts is doing. In a 15-week study, completing weekly challenges predicted trait change, and accepting them did not (Hudson et al. 2019). Finishing small things is the practice. That is the whole design of a Daily Action inside the Journey, our paid subscription, and it is why we don't promise a transformation.

What the Big Five can't tell you

A personality model describes tendencies. It can't see how much is on your plate, how tired you are, or whether the thing you stopped was worth finishing. Some projects should stay unfinished, and letting one go on purpose is a decision, not a failure. Our twenty questions are also a short form, noisier than a long one, and we say so on the science page.

If not finishing has been true at school, at work and at home for as long as you can remember, and it is costing you things that matter, please talk to a doctor. A personality test is the wrong tool for that.

Questions people ask

Is not finishing things a personality trait?

Not on its own. It goes most with low Conscientiousness and with how unpleasant the task feels (Steel 2007), and your other dials shape where you stall.

Does high Openness make you start more than you finish?

It can feel that way, since new ideas are the fun part, but Openness showed almost no link to procrastination (r ≈ .03). Conscientiousness and the task itself mattered far more (Steel 2007).

Does being hard on yourself help you finish?

The evidence leans the other way. Students who forgave themselves for putting off one exam put off the next one less, especially those who'd put it off most (Wohl, Pychyl & Bennett 2010).

Sources

Every claim above is cited in the text. Each paper, with a link to it:

  1. Steel (2007) Psychological Bulletin. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure
  2. Sirois & Pychyl (2013) Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self
  3. Credé, Tynan & Harms (2017) JPSP. Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature
  4. Gollwitzer & Sheeran (2006) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes
  5. Wohl, Pychyl & Bennett (2010) Personality and Individual Differences. I forgive myself, now I can study: How self-forgiveness for procrastinating can reduce future procrastination
  6. Roberts, Walton & Viechtbauer (2006) Psychological Bulletin. Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
  7. Roberts et al. (2017) Psychological Bulletin. A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention
  8. Hudson et al. (2019) JPSP. You have to follow through: Attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change

Find out which dials you're working with. Twenty questions, free.

The Assessment and your Archetype are free. The Journey, if you want more, is a paid subscription: $14.99 a month, cancel anytime.